NOT having children could be the best way to help the planet: study

If you want to help save the planet from climate change, it is not enough to recycle, modify your diet or your thoughts … now you must make an important decision: have children or not. We must be aware that it is not a good time to feel hopeful and dream of a promising future. Climate change is not a theory but something tangible, and governments and people take time to act.

However, some scientists found the “definitive solution” to stop the destruction of the planet: not having children, since they discovered that this reduces the generation of garbage and other chemicals.

After recognizing that we are losing the battle against this problem, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published a scientific report in which it ensures that pollution can be stopped:

Global carbon pollution must be halved by 2030 and then to zero by 2050, to avoid worse consequences of climate change, including drowned coastal cities, worsening storms and the disappearance of coral reefs.

But a controversial investigation claimed: not having children It is the best we could do for the planet.

The study by Seth Wynes and Kimberly Nicholas, published in the journal Environmental Research Letters, states that not spawning would reduce the planet’s carbon production.

According to specialists, not having children reduces carbon dioxide by almost 57 tons per year, much more than if 650 adolescents committed to recycling for the rest of their lives.

Research also emphasizes avoiding car use, adopting a vegetarian diet, and reducing the amount of pollutants.