Clizia Incorvaia postponed to trial: she posted photos of her younger daughter without the consent of the former Francesco Sarcina

A few days ago Republic He had revealed that Francesco Sarcina He had denounced his ex -wife Clizia Incorvia because, to advertise some products, he had published photos and videos of the nine -year -old daughter Nina. Now the same newspaper says that the influencer, one year after the complaint of the leader of vibrations, It has been indicted: “The hearing is set for mid -December”. There PM Alessia Mielecontinues Republic“He established, in the act with which they sued Incorvaia, that”In order to profit For himself and for others, in clear violation of the commitments made during the separation from the former spouse Sarcina, he proceeded in absence of its consent To the diffusion on the web of photos and images and videos portraying daughter Nina “in at least five advertising contexts that are listed in the decree and correspond to brands of clothes or girls shoes. In practice, Incorvaia has violated the privacy law of the 9 -year -old daughter to profit from it”.

In 2019 the singer had already denounced incorva for the same reasons, but everything had resolved because the influencer, supporting the will of the father, had stopped publishing photos and videos of the daughter on her social channels. Since last year, however, Clizia – who is also the mother of Gabriele, 3 years old from the current husband Paolo Ciavarro – would be Back to show Nina on the web. The frontman of the vibrations to the lawsuit – as revealed by Republic – had also attached some SMS in which the influencer would admit that with the sponsorships He manages to keep the family: «To my requests via messaging addressed to Ms. Incorvaia to cease to use the image of our daughter on social and advertising purposes, the same replied verbatim to me:”I field them thanks to the fashion brands and pay the school, clothes, etc “as shown as a screenshot that is attached; thus admitting that the image of the girl is also used in order to draw an economic profit Without any authorization and control of the writer on such management ».

In the lawsuit Sarcina had also clarified that his greatest fear is linked to Psychophysical repercussions and to the dangers to which Nina, especially because the daughter of two famous people, could meet because of her “obsessive media exposure». When Sarcina’s complaint had become public, Incorvaia had responded to the accusations of the ex -husband with a long social post in which she explained in summary: «I am a person who deeply loves his daughter. And I know that, despite the end of a wedding, she is a wonderful, serene, resolved, happy girl. I feel a sense of shame in front of those who, in order to hit the other parent, does not reflect on the damage it can cause To a child who will read all this one day. Words remain, and hurt more than the facts ». Now, one year after the complaint of the ex -husband, the summons direct to trial came for the influencer.