Against feminism, who are the new conservatives who claim the ideal of lean, fertile and submissive woman

In an era in which feminist movements make their way strongly to claim women’s rights, in the United States a contradictory phenomenon is gaining land. Is called Womanosphere and, instead of promoting female emancipation, denies the principles of modern feminism, proposing a return to traditional life models, where beauty and motherhood are celebrated Like true female powers.

Some of the best known faces of this conservative current are those of Brett Cooper, Candace Owens and Riley Gaines, influencer who, instead of challenging patriarchy, enhance traditional genre roles And they invite women to rediscover their alleged “true nature” inside the house and family. But behind this rhetoric, there is a paradox: while these figures present themselves as rebels against feminism and progressive culture, they are actually proposing ancient forms of conformism that risk being trapped in a model that leaves no room for individuality and diversity.

This movement is capturing an increasing number of young womenfascinated by the promise of a world in which feminism and “culture woke»They are seen as deceptions that undermine the foundations of society. Unlike traditional conservatives, The influencers of the Womanosphere they mainly turn to a young, often feminine audience.

Brett Cooper, one of the rise in the rise of this movement, quickly earned visibility Thanks to its show on YouTube, which attracts millions of spectators. His position is clear: “Men built civilization, from the houses in which we live in the space shuttles in which celebrities fly,” he said in one of the most discussed episodes, ridiculating the idea that women can be autonomous in a world built by men. But, according to her, there is nothing wrong with this. Indeed, recognizing and celebrating this “dependence” is a sign of lost wisdom, which feminism has obscured today.

Cooper is not alone. Platforms like Evie and channels like CANDACE CLUB They propose a narrative in which women do not affirm themselves through their career or individual success, but through their role within the family. According to these media, The real female power lies in becoming mothers and wives, rather than career women or movement leaders. These figures promote the idea that a woman’s greatest success is to create a traditional family and follow its model, rejecting the social and cultural challenges that have characterized the evolution of women’s rights.

This retrospective vision is not only a mere criticism of the successes achieved by the feminist movement. It is also a regret for an era in which the genre roles were clear, established and not questionable.

In this perspective, The existence of a “perfect femininity” is the final goal to be achieved. Not an inclusive or diversified femininitybut an idealized and limited, which involves a young and articulated, fertile body, capable of creating the perfect family. These women, from these influencers, are presented as the Palades of a world that refuses the “corruption” of progressive policies, in which the female body is seen as the only true tool of realization. The dream that is offered to the new generations is not a brilliant career, but a life of apparent domestic serenity, without frills or complications.

Women who do not adapt to this model – for example those that do not comply with aesthetic standards, those with different life experiences or those that are not interested in becoming mothers – are easily marginalized. It is not uncommon for the dissenting voices to be accused of being “too free”, “too rooted in feminism” Or, again, “too inclined to the culture of resentment”. We try to push women towards a limited vision of themselves, an image that leaves no room for the variety and complexity of female experiences.

Why does this vision have such a strong call? Maybe because the Generation Z is experiencing a period of profound uncertainty. Loneliness is one of the largest challenges for young people, who find themselves navigating a complex world, marked by precariousness and chaos. In this context, the message of the Womanosphere It seems to offer a way out: a simple life, made of strong family ties and a commitment that does not require fighting against the system. In practice, the proposal of a return to the traditional family appears as a safe refuge in a world that, in many cases, seems too large and impersoncrutable.

The growing popularity of these conservative platforms and personalities cannot be ignored. Significant spaces are being conquered in the media panorama, proposing a model that is unfortunately carrying out a vision of women who limit them, which leaves no margin for individuality. Instead of advancing towards a future of true power and freedom for women, he could direct society to A dangerous return to old subordination dynamicsmasked by an apparent feminine “empowerment”.